<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Shek&#039;s Footprint &#187; federal funding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sheksfootprint.com/archives/category/federal-funding/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sheksfootprint.com</link>
	<description>One Guy, Three Bicycles, One World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 17:05:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>I Dont Need No&#8230;.Cash For Clunkers!!!</title>
		<link>http://www.sheksfootprint.com/archives/288</link>
		<comments>http://www.sheksfootprint.com/archives/288#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Abhishek Mukherjee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bicycling Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Car Free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City Bike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Living Green]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sheksfootprint.com/?p=288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[$4500 is given towards a new car to people whose clunker achieved 10 mpg or more lower than the new car. $3500 if the mpg difference between the clunker and the new car is less than 10. Lets assume that most people with an 18 mpg clunker &#8220;upgraded&#8221; to an SUV achieving 5 mpg more. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$4500 is given towards a new car to people whose clunker achieved 10 mpg or more lower than the new car. $3500 if the mpg difference between the clunker and the new car is less than 10. </p>

<p><p>Lets assume that most people with an 18 mpg clunker &#8220;upgraded&#8221; to an SUV achieving 5 mpg more. They received $3500 from the $1,000,000,000 allocated funding. Some simple division later, approximately 285,000 clunkers were pulled off the streets (1,000,000,000 / 3500). Therefore, there are now 285,000 people or families on the road saving 5mpg (or saving 0.012 gallons per mile) more than they usually were. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.sheksfootprint.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/l-480-268-662d904c-186f-4c69-9d12-3378cc57e22e.jpeg"><img src="http://www.sheksfootprint.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/l-480-268-662d904c-186f-4c69-9d12-3378cc57e22e.jpeg" alt="" width="300" height="167" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-364" /></a></p>
<p>An average family drives around 15,000 miles a year. This leads to 180 gallons of gasoline saved per family per year. For the 285,000 clunkers replaced, we save 51,300,000 gallons of gasoline every year. Increase the federal funding to $3 billion and we will save a little over 153 million gallons of gasoline every year. </p>
<p>If the average clunker is replaced by a vehicle achieving 7.5 mpg higher, with a $3 billion stimulus, America will save almost 205,200,000 gallons of gasoline every year. </p>
<p>The total consumption of Finished Motor Gasoline is 137,801,370,000 gallons (approximately 8,989,000 barrels per day in 2008. Data from <a href = http://www.eia.doe.gov/basics/quickoil.html>http://www.eia.doe.gov/basics/quickoil.html</a>). Hence, a $3 billion funding, by saving 205,200,000 gallons of gasoline, saves only 0.1489% of total consumption. Not too significant in my opinion. </p>
<p>To achieve a 1% reduction in nationwide motor gasoline usage, around $20 billion (that is $20,000,000,000) needs to be pumped into the new-car market replacing over 5.7 million vehicles with a new vehicle achieving 7.5 mpg higher. </p>
<p>I wonder if gasoline consumption can be reduced by 1% by utilizing only $3 billion in bicycle infrastructure and alternate energy driven mass transit and rail infrastructure? The budget for this year&#8217;s Mass Transit infrastructure is $8 billion, $5 billion more each year for the next 5 years, not including operating costs. The Cash-for-Clunker&#8217;s $3 billion will be a nice addition to the mass transit budget and shave off 8 months from the 5 year proposal. </p>
<p>Further, evaluating the impact on a family, and assuming $3 billion in funding, these 857,000 families (285,000 X 3, assuming one clunker per family though there is no such rule) will save around 180 gallons of motor gasoline related expenses. At an average cost of $2.50 per gallon of gasoline, each family saves a measly $450 a year and gains $15,000 or more debt on a depreciating asset. With $3 billion in funding towards overhauling the streets to make bicycling actually and subjectively safe, families may be able to reduce from two cars to one, saving upwards of $4000 annually in car payments, insurance and gas. </p>
<p>My 50 year old mass produced dutch city bike, a text book definition of clunker, needs no replacement. At the most, it needs $50 of TLC. The next time someone tells me to get a registration for my bicycle, I&#8217;ll tell them at least I don&#8217;t need Cash for my Clunker!</p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sheksfootprint.com/archives/288/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

